Ich lade Sie zu einem Vergleich ein, der hinkt. Vorab: Eloquenz, analytische Verve ist eine Sache, Verwaltungspraxis eine andere: Verstanden, aber für die Außenansicht dennoch: Wir sprechen hier über das öffentliche Gesicht von Behörden, potentiell Überzeugungskraft, traction.
Einerseits Herr Almunia, DG COMP, “New Transatlantic Trends in Competition Policy”:
As I tried to explain today, in addition to the existing cooperation we see a common trend in innovation. This is excellent news as innovation and competitiveness are fundamental to Europe and to a sustainable exit from the crisis whether in Europe or in the US.
Tried. Andererseits Herr Rosch, FTC, “Rewriting History: Antitrust Not As We Know It . . . Yet”:
I believe that now, more than anytime before, are we in the U.S. are closer to agreement with the EC [EU]. Much of that has to do with the fact that, as the EC has gotten more sophisticated and experienced in its competition law – as, for example, Europe’s openness to less measurable non-price competition, consideration of quality and innovation, and its conclusion that consumer choice is a value in considering the impact of a practice on consumer welfare – the U.S. has opened itself up to newer forms of economic thinking, we have met in the center. Nonetheless, differences remain.
Kommentare